The time has come for a new paradigm of lifelong relationships. During the 20th century, it became clear that the patterns and structures of lifelong monogamous relationships did not work! I mean a dysfunctional relationship called “marriage” defined and formed by the state legislature. Relationships don’t matter. It is the financial structure of the marriage system designed by legislators that reduces people’s desire to marry.
Over the last 40 years, coexistence has increased by 1150%. At the same time, divorce rates in the United States are still rising, making it one of the highest per capita divorce rates in the world. Divorce has increased by 500% per person since the Marriage Law was enacted in the early 1900s. Every relationship has its challenges. We usually see these challenges as differences in personality and lifestyle. During marriage, there is always a need to overcome personality and lifestyle differences while maintaining a healthy love relationship. There is also a second challenge that most of us do not consider when considering the possibility of marriage.
State and federal family law laws have added another variable to the dynamics of marriage. It is pool money, collective liability for debt, and joint ownership of assets. Why did lawmakers include sharing of assets, liabilities, debt, and unpaid judgments in marriage agencies? Does it improve relationships or extend potential lifespan? Does this standard change the motivation for marriage? What is the impact on divorce motives? Is current family law what our religious ancestors wanted? Visit:- https://www.s-mariage.com/
More than 15 million people live together in the United States, and this number is growing exponentially. For the first time in history, there are more unmarried households than married households.
America is in the midst of a major social revolution in terms of traditional relationships and intimate, lifelong commitments. Part of the liability lies in state family law (marriage / divorce law), state / federal marriage tax fines, and fines for married persons’ social security. Other reasons for the high divorce rate are directly due to the major social changes in marriage efforts, coupled with the social acceptance of multiple intimate relationships in a person’s life.
Psychologists argued that money and finances were the main reasons for a dysfunctional marriage. What if money issues weren’t part of your lifelong romance? Eternal commitment or “EC” is an alternative to marriage in which you have a committed relationship for life. But they don’t have money or co-ownership issues.
Thousands of years ago, marriage was created by various religions, defined as a lifelong bond that loves heterosexual couples, and created a divinely recognized family unit.
The marriage was blessed by the priests, and the vows were shared under the eyes of God during proper ceremonies and proclaimed in public. Marriage was a spiritual commitment that the husband and wife were “mentally” united rather than financially. There was no government intervention or marriage law requiring marriage to be an economic partnership. It would have been unnecessary as religion strongly discouraged divorce.
The traditional marriage structure, created thousands of years ago, is more functional and self-reliant than marriage because it is today’s structure. Modern society has imposed a myriad of challenges on all formal relationships, including marriage itself. The inclusion of state-owned financial partnerships in the marriage system has motivated all aspects and stages of marriage to malfunction.
Most couples believe that marriage is a lifelong endeavor. However, in reality, marriage has three obligations. The first is a personal commitment to the love and friendship of life. This is the most important commitment. Without this commitment, there would be no other commitment. The second commitment is a spiritual or faith-based commitment. It is optionally based on one’s faith.
The third commitment is the Marriage Law commitment. It’s a financial structure commitment for your marital relationship. The financial structure of the Marriage Law is synonymous with the formation of a 50/50 business partnership. Yes, you can easily double the economic structure of marriage by starting a 50/50 business. In the case of marriage, income is considered joint income, the debt acquired by a person is joint or joint debt, the couple forms a legal entity, and the couple is a “taxable” entity according to the IRS. Like a for-profit company. I don’t know a couple getting married to start a business partnership. This is the basis of the dysfunctional relationship in today’s marriage.